Four Terrifying Ways Space Can Kill You

By Anthony Wood

We’re all clamoring to get into space these days, but lost in our excitement to fly to the Moon and colonize Mars is a brutal truth: the final frontier is a cold, inhospitable wasteland that’ll kill you at the first opportunity it gets. Astronauts already know this, but for the rest of us, here are just a few of the potentially lethal dangers faced by spacefaring pioneers.

Image: SyFy

Exposure to the vacuum of space

Let’s handle the most obvious danger first—exposure to vacuum. This is, as I’m sure would-be explorers are taught on the first day of astronaut school, something that would best be avoided.
Exposure to the extreme low pressure environment of space would cause an immediate vaporization of fluids in the skin and uppermost layers of soft tissue. This would cause bubbles to form in the blood, and some seriously nasty swelling, though counter pressure exerted by your skin and circulatory system would keep the expansion in check, preventing you from “exploding,” as science fiction loves to depict death-by-vacuum exposure.

Based on animal studies and the little data we have on human exposure to a vacuum, you would likely maintain some level of consciousness for the first 9 to 11 seconds before passing out due to a complete lack of oxygen. According to NASA, your mouth and nose would rapidly cool to freezing temperatures, and the liquid on your tongue, and soon after in the lining of your lungs, would boil.

NASA, being NASA, foresaw this issue, and solved the problem by developing spacesuits, which today are whimsically referred to as EMUs (Extravehicular Mobility Units). “EMUs are essentially a self-contained spacecraft with many layers of material to protect the astronauts from the vacuum of space, micrometeorite impacts, and extreme temperatures,” Bryan Dansberry of NASA’s Johnson Space Center told Gizmodo.

Image: 20th Century Fox


The drawback? “Spacesuits increase the effort required to do even the most basic tasks we take for granted on Earth,” Dansberry said. “The layers combined with the pressurization of the suit add to the effort for each movement, and finger movement is particularly challenging.”

The next generation of spacesuits will be lighter, more manoeuvrable, and generally higher tech. Future EMUs (great band name if anyone is looking) will also have to combat an entirely new environment, and new dangers.

“The EMUs in use today are designed for use in microgravity with significantly different requirements than those necessary for operation on the surface of Mars,” Dansberry said. Current EMUs don’t provide the mobility an astronaut on the Red Planet would need for, say, bending over to pick up a rock, or pulling a potato out of the ground. “Mars also has an atmosphere, and a suit for Mars would need to be designed differently than suit designed for vacuum.”

If you’re planning on visiting space before these sleeker EMUs hit the market, a warning—in the event of a spacesuit breach, there are currently no means of sealing a tear or puncture. An astronaut would simply have to hightail it back to the airlock before the suit fully depressurized.

Drowning in space (really)

An important lesson—sometimes, your life-protecting EMU may attempt, albeit inadvertently, to kill you.

On July 16, 2013, as Italian astronaut Luca Parmitano was working on the outside of the ISS, his EMU’s cooling system failed, and proceeded to slowly flood his helmet. According to a detailed blog post penned by Luca in 2013, he was at first unaware of the severity of the situation. He considered that the wet sensation at the back of his helmet might be water from his drinking straw, or even a build-up of sweat from the effort needed to manipulate the heavy spacesuit.

But the liquid was too cold to be sweat, and Luca could see no water escaping from his straw. The order was given to terminate the spacewalk, and return immediately to the airlock. As Luca retraced his path, the volume of liquid increased, covering his visor and headphones.

To make matters worse, in order to navigate around an antenna blocking his path back to the airlock, Luca was forced to shift orientation, causing the liquid to cover his nose, making it harder to breath. With the setting of the Sun, he was left blind, disorientated and unsure of his path to the airlock. In his darkest moment, the astronaut considered venting the water into space by releasing a safety valve located on his helmet.

Thankfully, the story had a happy ending, and the valve remained untouched. Luca was able to follow his safety cable back to the hatch, where he waited for fellow astronaut Chris Cassidy to join him before beginning repressurization.

As Luca summarized the event, “Space is a harsh, inhospitable frontier and we are explorers, not colonisers. The skills of our engineers and the technology surrounding us make things appear simple when they are not, and perhaps we forget this sometimes. Better not to forget.”

An unfortunate meeting with orbital debris

Considering the fact that the ISS has been flying continuously since 1998, the space lab is in a remarkably good condition. However, the health of the station, and that of its human crew, is under an ever-increasing threat from orbital debris.

The ISS is protected by hundreds of micrometeoroid and orbital debris (MMOD) defenses, making it the most heavily shielded spacecraft ever to orbit Earth. While this is enough to guard against impacts from tiny dust particles, the shielding would be unable to protect the station and its crew from a collision with a large piece of space trash.

The critical systems of the space station—its habitable compartments and pressure tanks—are its best protected parts, but they could still be heavily damaged by a piece of space debris over a centimeter in diameter.

 According to estimates generated via statistical modelling, there are roughly 29,000 pieces of space debris larger than 10 cm in diameter in orbit, and roughly 750,000 pieces with a diameter between 1 and 10 cm. Some of these pieces of trash are known to circle the planet at over 17,500 miles per hour. At such a velocity, even a small piece of debris would pack an enormous punch.

Despite the proliferation of debris in low-Earth orbit (LEO), a worst case Sandra Bullock Gravity-esque scenario is highly unlikely to unfold. This is thanks to the sophisticated early warning system that watches over the ISS.

Large pieces of space trash are regularly tracked by the U.S. Space Surveillance Network. If the likelihood of a dangerous piece of debris passing within 1 km of the station exceeds 1 in 1000, the ISS is ordered to temporarily boost to a higher orbit, relying on the thrusters of a docked Soyuz spacecraft. This happens on average once per year.

To date, there has been no significant damage to the ISS via a collision with debris, but to prepare for such a scenario the crew run regular depressurization drills. During these practice scenarios, the crew attempts to identify and seal a simulated leak. If a genuine breach was to put the station at risk, the crew would be directed to move to their Soyuz spacecraft, and use them as lifeboats to return to Earth.

The relentless effects of microgravity and radiation

Put yourself in the boots of an astronaut. You may think that upon touching down on Earth in your trusty Soyuz chariot, the danger has passed and you have bested the challenging environment of low Earth Orbit, emerging triumphant.

Wrong. The fact is that scientists are far from fully understanding the long-term effects that microgravity has on the human body, but we are aware of more than a few unpleasant side effects of life in microgravity.

“The microgravity environment is damaging to human physiology primarily because your body doesn’t experience the same forces in space as it does on Earth,” Joseph C. Wu , director at the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, told Gizmodo. “Floating or pulling yourself around in space doesn’t require exerting as much force as on the ground, as there is no gravity to oppose your movement. This leads to one of the most serious side effects to long-term spaceflight: significant bone loss.”

 Read More on Gizmodo.

Comments